Why AI in ITAM can’t succeed without strong data foundations

But there’s a catch: AI is only as good as the data it’s built on. And ITAM can’t succeed without strong data foundations!

As an ITAM manager, you already know your data collections can have flaws (23^th CMDB cleanup project anyone?). But without setting up clear data policies, your stakeholders may be tricked into thinking AI solved all the issues!

Many organizations are eager to adopt AI-driven ITAM solutions, yet they overlook critical prerequisites: robust discovery data policies, comprehensive coverage, and validated data. Without these, AI can introduce more risk than reward!

Discovery tools are essential for identifying assets across the IT estate. But without clear policies governing how data is collected, filtered, and maintained:

• assets may be missed or duplicated;
• inconsistent naming conventions and metadata can confuse AI models.

The result? AI insights that are unreliable or misleading.

For example, an AI model might recommend license re-harvesting based on outdated usage data - leading to compliance issues or user disruption.

AI thrives on visibility. If your discovery tools only scan part of your environment - say, on-premises servers but not cloud workloads or remote endpoints - then:

• AI decisions are based on partial truths;
• shadow IT and unmanaged assets remain hidden;
• security and compliance risks silently grow.

Bottom line: AI can’t optimize what it can’t see!

Unvalidated data undermines trust

Data validation ensures that what’s discovered is accurate, normalized, and reconciled. Without it:

• AI may misclassify software titles or misinterpret usage metrics;
• forecasts and recommendations become flawed;
• stakeholders lose confidence in ITAM outputs.

Think of AI as a magnifier: if your data is clean, it amplifies value; if your data is messy, it amplifies risk.

AI doesn’t replace audit readiness. If your asset data lacks traceability or consistency:

• you may fail software audits due to inaccurate entitlement vs. consumption records;
• regulatory compliance (e.g. GDPR, ISO/IEC 19770) may be compromised;
• AI-driven decisions could inadvertently violate licensing terms.

AI should support business goals, but poor data can lead it astray:

• it may prioritize cost savings over risk mitigation;
• it might recommend asset disposal for tools still critical to operations;
• decision-makers may act on false trends, wasting time and budget.

Conclusion: AI is not a substitute

AI in ITAM is a powerful enabler, but it’s not a substitute for foundational discipline. Before investing in AI, organizations must:

• define and enforce discovery data policies;
• ensure full coverage across all environments;
• validate and normalize asset data continuously.

Only then can AI deliver accurate, actionable, and trustworthy insights that elevate ITAM from operational necessity to strategic advantage.